Wednesday, January 14, 2026
Tim

Every few months, a familiar fear resurfaces:
“If AI can write code… will programmers become useless?”
It’s a reasonable question.
After all, tools like ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, and AI-powered IDEs can now:
To someone standing outside the tech world, it looks obvious:
👉 Why hire humans if AI can code faster?
But this question hides a deeper misunderstanding—not just about AI, but about what programming actually is.
So let’s answer it honestly, without hype or denial:
Will AI kill coding—or create more programmers than ever before?
The biggest mistake people make is assuming:
Coding = typing syntax
That was never true.
Syntax is the least valuable part of programming.
Programming is actually about:
Typing code is just the last mile.
AI helps with that mile—but it doesn’t decide where to go.
Imagine a restaurant owner says:
“I want an app to manage orders, inventory, and staff shifts.”
An AI can generate:
But it cannot:
That thinking still comes from humans.
AI writes code.
Humans design systems.

Fear doesn’t come from nothing.
Something real is changing.
Tasks like:
These are now faster with AI.
That means:
This feels like job loss—but it’s actually job evolution.
Ten years ago:
Now:
This creates a strange paradox:
We’ve seen this pattern before.
Assembly programmers feared:
“C will kill low-level programming.”
It didn’t.
It created more software, not less.
Developers said:
“React / Django / Rails will kill real programmers.”
Instead:
AI is the next abstraction layer.
Abstractions don’t kill professions.
They expand them.
Let’s be precise.
AI will reduce demand for:
That’s uncomfortable—but also overdue.
Here’s the part most headlines ignore.
AI is creating new kinds of programmers.
People who:
These developers are more valuable, not less.
As code becomes easier to generate:
Become the real bottlenecks.
AI doesn’t own these yet.
Developers who:
This is why solo founders are rising.
AI doesn’t eliminate coding.
It multiplies those who can code.
Without programmers:
AI without human oversight is dangerous, not productive.
This sounds counterintuitive—so let’s break it down.
AI lowers the cost of building software.
When software becomes cheaper:
Each experiment still needs:
Cheaper creation → more creation overall
Soon, software won’t just be apps.
It will be:
Most of this won’t be built by giant tech companies.
It will be built by millions of programmers, empowered by AI.
Let’s be realistic.
When software breaks, someone is still responsible.
That “someone” will be human.
AI will automate coding.
But programming is decision-making.
Think of it like this:
The medium changes.
The role remains.
Because it attacks identity.
Many developers were trained to believe:
“My value is my ability to write code.”
AI exposes a harder truth:
“Your value is your ability to think.”
That shift is painful—but powerful.
If you’re learning to code right now, here’s the honest guidance:

You’ll lose.
Treat AI as:
Not as your brain.
No.
AI will kill bad coding habits.
AI will kill low-value programming.
AI will kill syntax-only careers.
But it will also:
The future doesn’t belong to people who type code.
It belongs to people who understand problems and use code—AI-assisted or not—to solve them.
You may also like

How Over-Optimization Is Killing Natural Learning in the Modern Age
AN
Monday, February 16, 2026

Why Deep Thinking Feels Uncomfortable in Today’s Digital World
Tim
Sunday, February 15, 2026

How Digital Convenience Is Reshaping Human Discipline in the Modern Age
mona
Saturday, February 14, 2026